Home
entries friends calendar user info Goode Trouble Previous Previous
I Am My Avatar
Big Warm Fuzzy Public Heart
Add to Memories
Tell a Friend
If so, please contact me at tommybgoode@gmail.com. Thanks!

Tags: , , ,

Add to Memories
Tell a Friend
SEO kids: Google does NOT care about the keywords meta tag. Never did. May as well spraypaint "NOOB" on your forehead. Don't listen to me, listen to the official Google blogs. An obsession with the keywords meta tag is something to look out for when evaluating SEOs. Which you might not need to do anyway.

P.S. No, you don't have to "pay for your website to be on Google" either. [Headslap]

Tags: , ,

Add to Memories
Tell a Friend
A bing search for designing while intoxicated (no quotes required) brings up Rick's P'unk Avenue Window Blog post with that title as the #1 result, no muss no fuss no waiting.

A google search still brings up 500 other irrelevant things. Quote it and you get other pages that mention the phrase independently (fair enough), a whole bunch of pages that link to Rick's post (ooo-kay?), and... not Rick's post, ever, unless you add search terms to force it to look only at our site. Etc. I wrote about this problem ad nauseum already. The sitemap helped for a while, now it doesn't seem to be helping any more.

Ditto for svncampfire, a utility I wrote recently that pings svn repositories for new updates and notifies a campfire chatroom about them (*).

The creepiest result is a search for boutell sonnets. Google brings up my sonnets tag as the #2 result, after my LJ profile, which is okay. Bing brings up the sonnets tag as the #1 result, which is better. But Bing also adds a title:

"A New Sonnet Every Monday"

Whoa! Did somebody really go to the trouble to hand-tune that result? No, of course not. Their indexing system was clever enough to borrow it from a link on tommybgoode.com.

Other searches, some of them less self-serving, also suggest that Bing is doing a remarkable job so far. I'm going to switch to Bing for a week to whether I continue to feel that way. Google could use some serious competition.

(*) svncampfire's big attraction is that it uses the svn log command rather than a post-commit hook, so you can monitor an svn repository you don't run.

Tags: , , , , ,

Add to Memories
Tell a Friend
Dear Gmail,

WTF? You were awesome. Now you are PAUSE crap PAUSE and PAUSE I can't INTERMINABLE DELAY get anything PAUSE done. This is especially PAUSE bad when it affects my work email. Fix it. It's been weeks. We're thinking semiseriously about alternatives around here. Alternatives... to Google! That's right the unthinkable. Get on it.

No love,

Me.

Tags: , , ,

Add to Memories
Tell a Friend
After a lot of patient investigation I have come to the conclusion that Google loves blog home pages, and hates individual blog articles. It's pretty much true across the board.

I guess this is fine if you want to promote your brand in general, but if you want people to be able to actually find the information that prompted them to get your blog as a search result, it would be a much better idea for search results to point to the permalink and not the home page of the blog... which has changed by the time the user arrives.

Google's new BlogSearch is just as bad in this regard. It's useful if it was just blogged about today, useless if the post was made a while ago because it still wants to give you a home page, or page seven of the home page (which has itself changed by now to show content of another era), or what have you.

The only blogs that seem to get links to the individual articles in search results are those that display only a teaser for each article on the home page of the blog.

I am thinking we may have to do the same to get search results that actually help the long-tail searchers who comprise most of our true readership... or would if they could find the content at all.

Displaying only teasers on the home page also means that people are more likely to be on the actual article page when they decide to tweet it out or otherwise share it with others. Which is also a win from an SEO perspective.

The only trouble is that it'll annoy people who read our blog via RSS. I may be able to deal with that by arranging things so that RSS gets the whole thing while the home page on the web site displays just the teaser. Which would be an... ironic choice... but an effective one.

An alternative would be to use some sort of "hey Google, the definitive home of this content is over here on this link... see, it's really there, I'm not lying to you; please index THAT not THIS" strategy. It would be great if Google supported something like:
<a 
  href="/2008/05/05/awesome-article-title.html" 
  permalinkfor="story1">
Awesome Article Title
</a>
<div id="story1">
This is the body of the story as found in the home page. 
You'll find this same story on 
/2008/05/05/awesome-article-title.html, which Google should 
please, please, please index rather than the page it found 
this story on. Of course, if that page doesn't actually contain 
the same content you see here, Google should feel free to 
ignore the permalinkfor attribute in the link above.
</div>

Then again, Google could just start recognizing subpages that contain, just once, content that is aggregated on a parent page and making the deduction that they are blog permalinks. That'd work too.

Tags: , , , ,

Add to Memories
Tell a Friend
I did more digging and enabled the google webmaster tools.

robots.txt isn't blocking anything (an empty Disallow: with no / does not block anything; the webmaster tools confirm nothing is being blocked by robots.txt).

It turns out our individual articles are being indexed, they just rank very low unfortunately. I never see them come up for When I do a site:window.punkave.com "blah blah blah" search, I do get them. It looks like some of my earlier tests didn't verify this properly because I was looking for exact strings that were too long.

Good suggestions were made, notably setting up a sitemap and avoiding the "Permanent Link" prefix in titles. Removing dates from permalink URLs might also be a win. Right now we're saying "this stuff is deep, deep deep in a subdir and not as cool as the tags pages." But the tags pages aren't that great for search results because they change so much.

Thanks for the second and third and fifteenth set of eyes, guys.

Tags: , ,

Add to Memories
Tell a Friend
Actually Google loves this blog.

But Google hates window.punkave.com and I can't figure out why. We don't have any nofollow attributes or similar, and our articles have permalinks. Yet Google bitterly resists delivering our actual articles as search results. It will deliver category pages or our home page as an (often out of date) search result, but not the articles themselves.

If you search for (with the quotes):

"frosted lucky tags: they're magically persistent"

You get pages linking TO my article, and you get one variation on our blog's home page, but you never get the article itself. Even though I linked to the article itself from this blog. Which, as I mentioned, Google likes just fine.

I thought perhaps Google was penalizing all individual blog entries in all blogs as too ephemeral to store, but nope. If I google for:

"Beijing is a bad place to be a cat"

(With the quotes), I get back the permalink to my LiveJournal posting of that title just fine.

What's the story, morning glory? (Mmm, Morning Glory. Now I want a buttermilk biscuit.)

Tags: , ,

Add to Memories
Tell a Friend
Once upon a time Google bitchslapped me for selling direct text link advertising— ads which were clearly ads from a human standpoint, but the advertisers were hoping Google would thinking of them as editorial endorsements.

But here's the thing: in Japan Google is not the dominant search engine. Yahoo is. And like any other also-ran web site, Google Japan wants to be Web Site Numero Uno!

So Google Japan paid a bunch of bloggers to post about them. Which is at least one full step further in a black hat direction than anything Boutell.Com— and hundreds of nationally known newspaper sites and the like— were doing a few years ago when Google bent us all over its 800-pound gorilla knee.

So Google is spanking itself. They dropped google.co.jp's pagerank from a nine to a five in the Google seearch toolbar. Which is probably about as real as the original "warning shot over the bow" pagerank drop they applied to sites like mine.

I can't make this shit up folks.

TechPost: Google Uses Every Trick To Beat Yahoo In Japan

Matt Cutts of Google offers apology, describes Google's self-flagellation process

Tags: , , ,

Add to Memories
Tell a Friend
What do you say to the 8,000 pound search engine gorilla who LURVS you, really LURVS you, but insists on engaging in distressing and excessive marital practices?

Tags: , ,

Add to Memories
Tell a Friend
My fellow scurvy sea-dogs,

It has come to my attention that those landlubbers at Google have added a ninja theme option to GMail.

But there is NO PIRATE THEME OPTION.

This injustice must not stand!

Click here and sign my petition... or walk the plank:

http://www.petitiononline.com/gmpirate/petition.html

Yours,

Pirate Admiral Tom

Tags: , , , , ,

profile
Tom Boutell
User: [info]boutell
Name: Tom Boutell
Website: Goode Trouble
calendar
Back January 2010
12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31
page summary
tags